Industrial AI · Case study

QuantAirSense

AI-powered compressed air monitoring to help smaller manufacturers understand leaks, energy use and maintenance needs.

Explore the prototype
Compressed airPressure · flow · powerAI diagnostics

Make energy waste visible

Compressed air keeps production moving. Leaks and inefficient operation can be difficult to spot without specialist monitoring. QuantAirSense explores a more accessible route for SME manufacturers: interpret operating signals and turn them into clear, actionable diagnostics.

TRL 3–4

Feasibility prototype

WP1 + WP2

Requirements, architecture and AI models

Simulation

Primary development and test data

Diagnostics an operator can use

The web demonstrator combines leak classification, confidence scores and plain-language explanations. Pressure, flow and power signals help explain why a warning appeared and what to inspect next.

The project evaluates Random Forest classification, short-horizon forecasting and SHAP-based explanations. The dashboard brings these outputs together with maintenance risk and energy-efficiency indicators.

QuantAirSense feasibility dashboard showing a simulated moderate leak and recommended action

Prototype dashboard from the feasibility report. Shown with simulated operating data.

Four layers. One operational view.

The architecture separates data handling from inference and the operator interface, making each layer easier to test and refine.

01

Data

Import and validate time-series data. Use controlled simulations to explore normal operation and leak scenarios.

02

Processing

Prepare signals, derive features and classify conditions with trained machine learning models.

03

Analytics

Estimate energy use, forecast short-term behaviour and explain which signals influenced a result.

04

Demonstrator

Present system status, diagnostic context and recommended actions in a browser dashboard.

Simulated pressure, flow, power and forecasting charts from the QuantAirSense feasibility prototype

Pressure, flow, power and forecast views from a simulated leak scenario.

Evidence, with a clear boundary

The January 2026 WP1/WP2 report documents a functional feasibility prototype, trained models and internal review. It reports 94.6% mean classification accuracy in five-fold cross-validation and 3.2% single-step forecasting MAPE on simulation data.

These are feasibility results, not measured factory savings. Progression towards TRL 5–6 requires operational SME data, labelled leak events and calibration against real equipment.

The next step is factory validation

The planned progression is to collect pilot data, calibrate the models and evaluate performance in operating manufacturing environments.

Discuss industrial AI with us